Eddie Earl Haskin v. Stu Shermen

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20202:20-cv-03811California1,509 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION EDDIE EARL HASKIN, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-03811-JAK (JDE) ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER SUMMARILY v. ) DISMISSING PETITION FOR ) ) WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR ) LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER STU SHERMAN, Warden, ) ) JURISDICTION AND Respondent. ) REFERRING THE PETITION TO ) ) THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF ) APPEALS PURSUANT TO NINTH ) ) CIRCUIT RULE 22-3(A) 19 I. INTRODUCTION On April 27, 2020, the Court received a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Dkt. 1, “Petition” or “Pet.”) from Eddie Earl Haskin (“Petitioner”), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se. The case was reassigned to the current judicial officers on July 21, 2020. Dkt. 9. By the Petition, Petitioner seeks to challenge the legality of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.