Richard Payne v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICHARD PAYNE, an individual; CASE NO. CV 17-09044 CAS (KSx) JANCHAI PAYNE, an individual; K.P., [Hon. Judge Christina A. Snyder, 1st CH, Ctrm. 8D] a minor, by and through her guardian ad [Mag. Karen L. Stevenson , Roybal CH, Ctrm. 580] litem, Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES; Police Chief CHARLIE BECK, in his individual capacity; Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 4 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 5 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 6 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 7 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 8 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 9 discovery and that the protection it affords from…