Blanca Mejia v. Essential Services Group LLC
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20205:20-cv-01909California392 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No. ED CV 20-1909-DMG (KKx) Date September 23, 2020
Title Blanca Mejia v. Essential Services Group LLC, et atl. Page 1 of
Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present
Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS— ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT
SHOULD NOT DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Pro se Plaintiff Blanca Mejia filed this action on September 15, 2020. Compl. [Doc. # 1]. She contends that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over the matter. Id. at ¶ 4. To give rise to a court’s diversity jurisdiction, a lawsuit must place over $75,000 in controversy and concern parties that have complete diversity of citizenship (i.e., are citizens of different states). 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Complete diversity means that “each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.” In re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litig.,…