Karl L. Hassan v. Andrew M. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 KARL L. H., an Individual, Case No. 2:19-04988 ADS
Plaintiff,
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Karl L. H.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly rejected his testimony concerning pain and limitations he
23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. suffers. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.2 II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL A review of the entire record…