Karl L. Hassan v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20202:19-cv-04988California3,785 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 KARL L. H., an Individual, Case No. 2:19-04988 ADS

Plaintiff,

v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Karl L. H.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly rejected his testimony concerning pain and limitations he

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. suffers. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.2 II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL A review of the entire record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.