Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20205:20-cv-00971California725 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. EDCV 20-0971-ODW (KS) Date: September 24, 2020 Title Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA

Present: The Honorable: Karen L. Stevenson, United States Magistrate Judge

Gay Roberson Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioners: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL

On May 5, 2020, Petitioner, a California state resident proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On July 10, 2020, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”) on the grounds that the Petition is wholly unexhausted. (Dkt. No. 19.) Pursuant to the Court’s May 29, 2020 Order, Petitioner’s Opposition to that Motion was due within 30 days of the service of the Motion—that is, no later than August 9, 2020. (See Dkt. No. 12 at 3.)

On August 31, 2020, more than three weeks after Petitioner’s time to file the Opposition to the Motion expired, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause, directing Petitioner to explain why the Petition should not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.