Billy Nunley v. Kenneth Brock

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20202:20-cv-07119California1,912 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

4

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILLY NUNLEY, Case No. 2:20-cv-07119-JLS-SHK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING MATTER, v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

KENNETH BROCK,

15 Defendant.

17 On July 9, 2020, Plaintiff Billy Nunley (“Plaintiff”), a pro se prisoner incarcerated at California City Correctional Facility in California City, California, constructively filed1 a civil rights complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”) against Defendant Kenneth Brock (“Defendant”). Electronic Case Filing Number (“ECF No.”) 1, Compl. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES the matter, without prejudice. / / / / / / 26 27 1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se prisoner gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is signed. Douglas v. I. BACKGROUND On July 18, 2019, Plaintiff previously filed a similar complaint, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983(“§ 1983”) against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.