In re Luminance Recovery Center, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20202:20-cv-07747California434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In re LUMINANCE RECOVERY CV 20-7747 DSF

CENTER, LLC

Order DENYING Motion to Withdraw Reference RICHARD A. MARSHACK, Ch. 7 Trustee, Plaintiff,

v.

SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company has filed a motion to withdraw the reference of this adversarial action from the Bankruptcy Court. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The district court may withdraw, in whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under this section, on its own motion or on timely motion of any party, for cause shown. The district court shall, on timely motion of a party, so withdraw a proceeding if the court determines that resolution of the proceeding requires consideration of both title 11 and other laws of the United States regulating organizations or activities affecting interstate commerce. 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). “In determining whether cause exists, a district court should consider the efficient use of judicial resources, delay and costs to the parties, uniformity of bankruptcy administration, the prevention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.