ITN Flix, LLC v. Danny Trejo

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 ITN FLIX, LLC; and GIL MEDINA, Case № 2:20-CV-01978-ODW (AGRx)

Petitioners,

ORDER DENYING PETITION TO

v.

VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD

14 DANNY TREJO, [1-1] AND GRANTING REQUEST TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION Respondent.

AWARD [9]

17 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Now before the Court are Petitioners ITN Flix, LLC1 and Gil Medina’s Petition 20 to Vacate Arbitration Award (ECF No. 1-1) and Respondent Danny Trejo’s Request 21 to Confirm Arbitration Award (ECF No. 9). For the reasons discussed below, the 22 Court DENIES the Petition to Vacate and GRANTS the Request to Confirm the 23 Arbitration Award.2 24 1 As a preliminary matter, Petitioner ITN Flix, LLC is a business entity that cannot represent itself 25 pro se in federal court. C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-2.2.2; Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 201–02 (1993). Although Petitioner Medina may represent himself 26 pro se, that privilege is unique to him; he may not represent…