Jaime B. Garcia v. W. L. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME B. GARCIA, ) Case No. CV 14-1319-VBF (JPR) ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, )

Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) 16 The Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records 17 on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge, 18 which recommends that judgment be entered denying the FAP and 19 dismissing this action with prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1). Petitioner filed objections to the R. & R. on 21 August 6, 2020; Respondent did not reply. Having reviewed de 22 novo those portions of the R. & R. to which Petitioner objects, 23 see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court accepts the findings and 24 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 25 Petitioner argues that the Magistrate Judge incorrectly 26 concluded that the state courts were not objectively unreasonable 27 in finding that…