Ricardo Osorio v. United Pipe and Steel Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20205:20-cv-02043California611 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-02043 PA (SHKx) Date October 5, 2020 Title Ricardo Osorio v. United Pipe and Steel Corp.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G. Garcia Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER Before the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by defendant United Pipe and Steel Corp. (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 1 (“Removal”).) Defendant asserts this Court has jurisdiction over the action brought against it by plaintiff Ricardo Osorio (“Plaintiff”) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v, Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 375, 377 (1994). A suit filed in state court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.