Griselda Orellana v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20202:20-cv-06665California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. LA CV20-06665 JAK (PJWx) Date October 6, 2020 Title Griselda Orellana v. Target Corporation, et al

Present: The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Patricia Blunt Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION

This Order is issued sua sponte in light of the failure of the parties to comply with earlier ones issued in this action. Plaintiff shall show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A court has the inherent power to dismiss an action for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 631 (1962). In this action, the parties have failed to comply with three prior orders. First, pursuant to the Order Setting Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, the parties were required to file a Joint Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.