Dante Lizalde v. William Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20205:19-cv-02480California908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANTE LIZALDE, )Case No. EDCV 19-2480-MCS (JPR) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. )ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND )RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S.

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL )MAGISTRATE JUDGE

WILLIAM BARR, ) ) Respondent. ) 15 The Court has reviewed the Petition and Supplemental 16 Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. 17 Magistrate Judge, which recommends that Respondent’s motion to 18 dismiss be granted and judgment be entered dismissing this 19 action. On September 9, 2020, Petitioner filed Objections to the 20 R. & R., in which he mostly simply repeats arguments from his 21 opposition to Respondent’s motion and his other filings. On 22 September 23, Respondent filed a reply.1 23 1 That same day, Respondent filed notice that Petitioner was removed from the United States on August 27, 2020, arguing that the Petition and Supplemental Petition are therefore moot. But Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.