Craig Lamell Watley v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20202:19-cv-09298California3,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CRAIG L. W., Case No. 2:19-cv-09298-JC

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

v. [DOCKET NOS. 16, 17] 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

I. SUMMARY

18 On October 29, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for benefits. The 20 parties have consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate 21 Judge. 22 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment 23 (“Plaintiff’s Motion”), to which defendant filed an opposition (“Defendant’s 24 /// 25 26 1Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted to protect his privacy in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 Opposition”). The Court has taken the matter under submission without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.