Deion Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:20-cv-06498California2,142 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

In this representative action, Plaintiff claims that Defendant failed to pay him, and other aggrieved employees, reporting time wages. Plaintiff worked for Defendant from November 11, 2019, to January 10, 2020, as a non- exempt, hourly package loader and unloader at UPS hubs and terminals in Los Angeles. See First Amended Complaint, Dkt. # 1-2 (“FAC”), ¶ 8. Plaintiff claims that, as many as three times per week, after “clocking in” to Defendant’s timekeeping system, Defendant dismissed him from his shift without paying him reporting time wages. Id. ¶ 9, 18. For example, on instances where Defendant scheduled Plaintiff to work from 11:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., many times, Defendant would tell Plaintiff to clock out and go home after roughly a half-hour without paying him reporting time wages. Id. ¶ 19.

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-6498 PSG (AFMx) Date October 13, 2020 Title Deion Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al. As a result of Defendant’s practice, on April 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed suit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. See Notice of Removal, Dkt. # 1 (“NOR”), ¶ 1. On May 27,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.