Muning Zhong v. Phillips 66 Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20202:20-cv-09132California1,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-9132 PA (GJSx) Date October 7, 2020 Title Muning Zhong v. Phillips 66 Company, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Gabby Garcia Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Removal filed by defendant Phillips 66 Company (“Removing Defendant’). In its Notice of Removal, Removing Defendant asserts that this Court has Jurisdiction over the action brought against it by plaintiff Muning Zhong (‘Plaintiff’) based on the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v, Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S. Ct.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.