Matthew D. Van Steenwyk v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20202:20-cv-02375California4,837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 MATTHEW D. VAN STEENWYK, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02375-FMO (AFMx) Individually, as Trustee and Beneficiary of The Matthew Van Steenwyk Gst Trust STIPULATED PROTECTIVE And The Matthew Van Steenwyk Issue ORDER1 Trust, And As Co-Trustee Of The Gretchen Marie Van Steenwyk-Marsh Gst Trust And The Gretchen Marie Van Steenwyk-Marsh Issue Trust and 15 derivatively on behalf of Defendants

APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES

16 ASSOCIATES, INC., and ATA RANCHES, INC., Plaintiff, v. KEDRIN E. VAN STEENWYK, Individually, as Successor Trustee of the Donald H. Van Steenwyk and Elizabeth A. Van Steenwyk 1996 Revocable Trust; PAMELA PIERCE, Individually; PHILIP GOBE, Individually; PHILIP LONGORIO, Individually; GENE DUROCHER, Individually; DANIEL CARTER, Individually; JOSEPH MCCOY, Individually; ELIZABETH A. VAN STEENWYK, Individually, and as Original Trustee and as Beneficiary of the Donald H. Van Steenwyk and Elizabeth A. Van Steenwyk 1996 Revocable Trust;

1 This Stipulated Protective Order is based substantially on the model…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.