Hudena James v. US Bancorp

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20205:18-cv-01762California2,212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

facts within the personal knowledge of the declarant. “[C]onclusory, self- serving affidavit|s], lacking detailed facts and any supporting evidence,” are insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact. FTC v. Publ'g Clearing House, Inc., 104 F.3d 1168, 1171 (9th Cir.1997). Declarations must be made with personal knowledge; declarations not based on personal knowledge are inadmissible and cannot raise a genuine issue of material fact. See Skillsky v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 893 F.2d 1088, 1091 (9th Cir.1990) 2. Defense counsel included the trial court Judge Klausner on the service list while the case was on appeal. Plaintiff's believe this was counsel’s way of trying to ingratiate himself to the judge. 3. The defense attorney sought reconsideration/rehearing on the Circuit

Court’s order, granting part of the appeal.

Items 2 & 3 are not actions taken by Judge Klausner, but by one of the attorneys or the secretary of one of the attorneys. Unexplained is how these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.