Lawrence White v. Stu Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20202:20-cv-02518California225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE WHITE, Case No. CV 20-2518-CJC (PD)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

v.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE AND DENYING

STU SHERMAN,

CERTIFICATE OF

15 Respondent. APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that it erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 27 28 ! (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.