S.B.S.D.

Felix Tyrone Randle v. S.B.S.D.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20205:19-cv-01696California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION FELIX TYRONE RANDLE, Case No. 5:19-cv-01696-JWH (SHK)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

S.B.S.D., et al., JUDGE

Defendants.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the “Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to Dismiss Plaintiff’s § 1983 Claims, With Prejudice in Part and Without Prejudice in Part, and to Provide Plaintiff With Leave to Amend Certain Claims (the “R&R”) [Dkt. No. 6]. The court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Plaintiff has objected. The court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Judge Nakata and D.A. Cumino are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without leave to amend, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.