Guadalupe Beltran v. Procare Pharmacy LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4
8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California
11 12 GUADALUPE BELTRAN, Case No. 2:19-cv-08819-ODW(RAOx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISS
ACTION [26]
16 PROCARE PHARMACY, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
18 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is a Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss [the] Action 21 (“Motion”) filed by Defendants ProCare Pharmacy, LLC and Caremark Corporation 22 (collectively, “CVS”). (Mot. to Compel Arb. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 26.) CVS recently 23 filed a Motion to Stay discovery proceedings pending the outcome of the Motion. 24 (Mot. to Stay, ECF No. 39.) For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES 25 CVS’s Motion. Consequently, CVS’s Motion to Stay is also DENIED as moot, and 26 the hearing therefor is hereby VACATED.
28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter…