Brigham Field v. Genova Capital Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20202:20-cv-09563California1,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100 1111 BRIGHAM FIELD et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-09563-ODW-(JCx)

1122 Plaintiffs, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

1133 v. STATE COURT

1144 GENOVA CAPITAL, INC. et al.,

1155 Defendants.

1166

1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 On October 19, 2020, Plaintiffs Colette Pelissier and Brigham Field filed a 2200 Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Ventura (“State Court 2211 Action”). (Notice of Removal (“Removal”) ¶¶ 1, 10, Ex. 1 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1.) 2222 Plaintiffs contend Defendants Genova Capital, Inc. and California TD Specialists’ 2233 (“Defendants”) efforts to foreclose on their beach-front Malibu home are improper. 2244 (Compl. ¶¶ 23–40.) In the Complaint, Plaintiffs assert three claims for (1) relief 2255 pursuant to California Civil Code section 2924.17; (2) declaratory relief; and 2266 (3) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. (Id.) On October 19, 2020, 2277 Defendants removed the State Court Action to federal court, asserting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.