Warden

George Hernandez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20202:20-cv-09452California2,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION GEORGE HERNANDEZ, ) Case No. 2:20-cv-09452-MCS-JDE ) Petitioner, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ) v. ) PETITION SHOULD NOT BE ) DISMISSED WARDEN, CORCORAN )

STATE PRISON, )

) Respondent. ) 16 I. INTRODUCTION On October 13, 2020, Petitioner George Hernandez (“Petitioner”) filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. § 2254,” raising six grounds for relief. See Dkt. 1 (“Petition” or “Pet.”). The Court has reviewed the Petition consistent with its authority under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (“Habeas Rules”) and finds that the Petition suffers from at least four defects. The Court therefore orders Petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. II. PETITIONER’S CLAIMS 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.