Nora Delgadillo v. Andrew Saul
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20202:19-cv-09373California2,021 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nora G. D., Case No. 2:19-cv-09373 JAK (KES)
Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
v. RECOMME NDATION OF U.S.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Social Security, SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE Defendant. RECORD (Dkt. 20)
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation
(Dkt. 16), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of
the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 18). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 19) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and denies Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the administrative record. In her Objections, Plaintiff asserts that the Magistrate Judge ignored a medical record submitted…