Nora Delgadillo v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20202:19-cv-09373California2,021 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Nora G. D., Case No. 2:19-cv-09373 JAK (KES)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMME NDATION OF U.S.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING

Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO Social Security, SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE Defendant. RECORD (Dkt. 20)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation

(Dkt. 16), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of

the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 18). The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 19) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and denies Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the administrative record. In her Objections, Plaintiff asserts that the Magistrate Judge ignored a medical record submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.