Manufacturers Bank v. Amarpal S. Gharial

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20202:20-cv-09747California723 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-09747 PA (Ex) Date October 26, 2020 Title Manufacturers Bank v. Amparal S. Gharial, et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G. Garcia Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER

Before the the Court is a Notice of Removal filed by Kevin Sandoval (“Sandoval’’) on October 23, 2020. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff Manufacturers Bank (“Plaintiff”) filed its complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court alleging a single state-law claim for unlawful detainer. Sandoval, who is appearing pro se, asserts that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. (Id. 5-14.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.