Maika Fauteux v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 9 MAIKA FAUTEUX, CASE NO.: 2:20-cv-00925-DSF-RAO Plaintiff,
PROTECTIVE ORDER
v. WALMART, INC. and DOES 1-10, Courtroom: District Judge: Hon. Dale S. Fischer Defendants. Magistrate: Hon. Rozella A. Oliver Complaint Filed: March 12, 2019 Trial Date: December 7, 2021 16 17 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 18 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 19 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 20 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 21 be warranted. Accordingly, the Court enters the following Protective Order. The 22 parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 23 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public 24 disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled 25 to confidential treatment under the applicable legal…