Miguel Hernandez v. Ratana Sankul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MIGUEL HERNANDEZ, ) Case No. CV 20-7418 FMO (SKx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE RATANA SANAKUL, et al., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 16 On September 9, 2020, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases (see Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of September 9, 2020), which ordered plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment no later than seven calendar days after default is entered by the Clerk. (Id. at 3). The court admonished plaintiff that “failure to file a motion for default judgment within seven [] days of entry of default by the Clerk shall result in the dismissal of (1) the action and/or (2) the defendant against whom the motion for default judgment should have been filed.” (Id. at 3-4) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962)). Here, defendant was served with the…