Lisa Silveira v. M and T Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
44 55 66 77 United States District Court 88 Central District of California 99 1100
1111 LISA SILVEIRA, on behalf of herself and Case No. 2:19-cv-06958-ODW(KSx) all others similarly situated, 1122 AMENDED ORDER DENYING Plaintiff, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL [21] 1133 v. 1144
M&T BANK,
1155 Defendant. 1166
1177 1188 I. INTRODUCTION 1199 Plaintiff Lisa Silveira initiated this putative class action against Defendant 2200 M&T Bank (“M&T”), on behalf of a class of homeowners, alleging that M&T 2211 charged borrowers convenience fees when they made mortgage payments online and 2222 over the phone (“Pay-to-Pay Fees”). (See Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1.) The parties have 2233 reached a settlement on behalf of the class. Silveira now moves, without opposition, 2244 for preliminary approval of the parties’ agreement (“Proposed Settlement Agreement” 2255 or “Proposed Settlement”). (Mot. for Prelim. Approval (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF 2266 No. 21.) The Court has reviewed Silveira’s Motion and finds that Silveira fails to 2277 provide the Court with adequate information by which to …