Poupak Barekat v. Crown Vapors, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20208:20-cv-02077California709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. SACV 20-02077-CJC-DFM Date: October 30, 2020

Title: POUPAK BAREKAT v. CROWN VAPORS, LLC., et al.

PRESENT:

HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cheryl Wynn N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY

THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF’S UNRUH ACT CLAIM

On October 28, 2020, Plaintiff Poupak Barekat filed this action against Defendants Crown Vapors, LLC, JTECC Investment, LLC, and unnamed Does, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”). (Dkt. 1 [Complaint].) Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under the ADA and statutory damages under the Unruh Act. (Id. at 8–9.) Plaintiff contends that this Court has federal question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.