Breathe Technologies, Inc. v. Inogen, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20208:20-cv-00630California6,909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 Breathe Technologies, Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 8:20-cv-00630-MSC-JDE v. ) ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Inogen Inc., ) ORDER Defendant. )

21 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, the 22 Court makes the following findings and enters the following order. 23 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 24 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 25 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 26 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 27 warranted. Accordingly, the Parties stipulated to and petitioned the Court to enter 28 this Stipulated Protective Order, which is based on the Honorable John D. Early’s model protective order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.