Dorreen E. Trimmer v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20205:20-cv-01994California426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

BACKGROUND

On September 26, 2020, Plaintiff Dorreen T. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint challenging the denial of her application for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and/or Title XVI Supplemental Security Income by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1.

On September 29, 2020, the Court issued a Case Management Order (“CMO”) instructing Plaintiff to “promptly serve the summons and complaint on the Commissioner,” and to “electronically file a proof of service” within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Complaint, i.e. no later than October 26, 2020. Dkt. 9 at 1–2. The CMO warned Plaintiff that failure to follow those instructions “may result in dismissal of this case.” Id. at 2.

Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Hon. William Terrell Hodges, Memorandum RE: Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, COMMITTEE ON COURT ADMINISTRATION

AND CASE MANAGEMENT OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.