Aaron Raiser v. City of Murrieta

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20205:19-cv-00183California4,959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 AARON RAISER, Case No. EDCV 19-183-DSF (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

CITY OF MURRIETA, ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Aaron Raiser (“Raiser”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) alleging violations of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and state law claims pursuant to the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51, and the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, Cal Civ. Code § 52.1. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) at 119. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the TAC with leave to amend. /// /// II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On January 28, 2019,1 Raiser initiated the instant action by filing a Complaint 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.