Matthew Epstein v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20205:19-cv-01786California4,318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MATTHEW E., Case No. 5:19-cv-01786-JC

Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OPINION

v. 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.

I. SUMMARY

18 On September 18, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his applications for benefits. The 20 parties have consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate 21 Judge. 22 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary 23 judgment, respectively “Plaintiff’s Motion” and “Defendant’s Motion” 24 (collectively, “Motions”). The Court has taken the Motions under submission 25 26 1Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted to protect his privacy in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 1 without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15; Case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.