Natalie E. v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20205:19-cv-01552California5,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION 11 NATALIE E., ) No. ED CV 19-1552-PLA ) Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ) v. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER )

OF SOCIAL SECURITY )

ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 18 I. PROCEEDINGS Natalie E. (“plaintiff”) filed this action on August 19, 2019, seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) payments. The parties filed Consents to proceed before a Magistrate Judge on September 9, 2019, and September 24, 2019. Pursuant to the Court’s Order, the parties filed a Joint Submission (alternatively “JS”) on October 20, 2020, that addresses their positions concerning the disputed 26 In the interest of protecting plaintiff’s privacy, this Memorandum Opinion and Order uses plaintiff’s (1) first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.