Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. PhD Marketing, Inc.

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:20-cv-06745California5,784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

'O' 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, Case No. 2:20-cv-06745- INC. d/b/a Bang Energy; RSWL-JCx

JHO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

HOLDINGS, ORDER re: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Plaintiffs, Injunction [76] 16 v.

PHD MARKETING, INC.; DOES

1 to 10, 19 Defendants. 20 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion 22 for Preliminary Injunction [76]. Having reviewed all 24 papers submitted pertaining to this Motion, the Court 25 NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS: the Court DENIES the 26 Motion. 28 I. BACKGROUND 2 A. Factual Background 3 Plaintiff Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. d/b/a Bang Energy (“Vital”) is a manufacturer of nutritional 6 supplements and energy drinks, including the BANG energy 7 drink. Compl. 11, ECF No. 1. Plaintiff JHO Intellectual Property Holdings, LLC (“JHO”) owns the BANG …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.