Adrienna Simpson v. Andrew Saul

Bad Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20205:19-cv-01782California4,157 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ADRIENNA S., an Individual, Case No.: 5:19-01782 ADS

Plaintiff,

v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Adrienna S.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of her applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law

23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Judge (“ALJ”) improperly rejected her subjective symptom testimony. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. II. FACTS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.