Adrienna Simpson v. Andrew Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 ADRIENNA S., an Individual, Case No.: 5:19-01782 ADS
Plaintiff,
v.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Adrienna S.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of her applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law
23 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 24 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Judge (“ALJ”) improperly rejected her subjective symptom testimony. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. II. FACTS…