Raymond Tafolla, Jr. v. J. Pickett

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:20-cv-10105California2,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-cv-10105-ODW-MAA Date: November 17, 2020 Title: Raymond Tafolla, Jr. v. J. Pickett

Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

James Muñoz N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

N/A N/A

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Summarily Dismissed as Untimely; Order re: Incomplete Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

On November 2, 2020, the Court received and filed Petitioner Raymond Tafolla, Jr.’s (“Petitioner”) pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Section 2254”) (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1.) The Petition alleges two grounds for federal habeas corpus relief challenging a 1999 criminal judgment: (1) the trial court entered an unauthorized sentencing enhancement and (2) the trial court imposed restitution without assessing Petitioner’s ability to pay. (Id. at 31; see also Petition Memorandum of Points & Authorities (“Petition MP&A”), ECF No. 2.)

The Court takes judicial notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.