Grace Cho v. Maria Monroy

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:19-cv-10416California746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRACE CHO, ) Case No. CV 19-10416 FMO (RAOx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE MARIA MONROY, et al., ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 17 On November 2, 2020, the court issued an order denying plaintiff’s motion for default judgment without prejudice, (see Dkt. 20, Court’s Order of November 2, 2020), which ordered plaintiff to file a renewed motion for default judgment no later than November 13, 2020. (See id. at 4). The court admonished plaintiff that “failure to file a renewed motion for default judgment by [November 13, 2020] shall result in . . . the action against defendants being dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to comply with a court order.” (Id. at 4) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962)). As of the date of this order, plaintiff has not filed a renewed motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.