Celece
Celece v. Dunn School
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CELECE, et al., Case No. CV 20-10139 GW (PVCx) Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
v. SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT
STATUS BE
DUNN SCHOOL, et al., DENIED FOR LACK OF FEDERAL
JURISDICTION
Defendants. 16 On November 3, 2020, “Celece” and “John Doe,” California residents proceeding pro se (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a joint complaint against twelve named Defendants and two unknown Defendants raising twenty-six purported causes of action. (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1). Simultaneously with the Complaint, each Plaintiff separately filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (“IFP Requests,” Dkt. Nos. 5-6). However, the Complaint does not appear to provide a basis for federal jurisdiction because all of its purported federal claims appear to be untimely, non-cognizable, or both. 24 A. Standard 26 “A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the…