Baskin Robbins Franchising, LLC v. MYP Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20208:19-cv-02232California5,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC, et al., Case No. 8:19-cv-02232-JVS-JDE 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MYP Corporation, et al., 15 Defendants.

Related Third-Party Claims. 18 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 60) and for good cause shown 19 therein, the Court finds and orders as follows: 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 24 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 25 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 26 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 27 discovery and that the protection it affords from public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.