Giang Thuy Nguyen v. Scott Frauenheim

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20208:17-cv-01526California1,296 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GIANG THUY NGUYEN, ) Case No. SA CV 17-1526 FMO (JPR) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED v. ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 16 The court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus (Dkt. 49, “FAP”), records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 51, “R&R”), which recommends that judgment be entered denying the FAP and dismissing this action with prejudice. (See id. at 77); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 18, 2020, petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation [] (Dkt. 52, “Objections”), in which he reiterates the arguments raised in his FAP and Reply. (See id. at 6-12). Respondent did not respond to the Objections. Having reviewed the R&R and petitioner’s Objections to the R&R, the court concludes as follows. First, the court notes that the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.