Margie Brown v. The County of Los Angeles DPSS

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20202:20-cv-07404California664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

MARGIE BROWN, Case No. CV 20-07404-SB (DFM)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

DPSS et al.,

Defendants.

On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. 1. While the Magistrate Judge was screening the Complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A, the Notice of Assignment form was returned as undeliverable. See Dkt. 5. Accordingly, on September 14, 2020, the Magistrate Judge ordered Plaintiff to provide a current address within fourteen (14) days. See Dkt. 9. Plaintiff was also reminded of her obligation to keep the Court apprised of her current address and expressly warned that failure to respond could result in dismissal for lack of prosecution. See id. That order was also returned as undeliverable. See Dkt. 8. Plaintiff has not otherwise filed a change of address or a reply to the Court’s orders. Local Rule 41-6 requires a party representing herself to “keep the Court . . . . apprised of such party’s current address and telephone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.