Abdel Malak v. John Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20205:20-cv-00322California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABANOOB ABDEL-MALAK, Case No. 5:20-cv-00322-JWH-KKx

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR

EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE

JOHN DOE, et al., ORDER AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [Dkt. No. 44] Defendants.

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On November 17, 2020, Plaintiff Abanoob Abdel-Malak moved ex parte for an emergency protective order and temporary restraining order, among other relief. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Application is DENIED. Through the Application, Plaintiff seeks an emergency order on grounds that are mostly unintelligible. Plaintiff’s Application appears to be related to the relief sought by Plaintiff in his prior applications, each of which this Court denied. Regardless, Plaintiff has not made the requisite showing for entry of an emergency protective order or temporary restraining order, let alone on an ex parte basis. “The opportunities for legitimate ex parte applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.