Jesus Castro v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20202:19-cv-01651California3,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS C., ) Case No. CV 19-1651-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) 18 I. INTRODUCTION On March 6, 2019, plaintiff Jesus C. filed a complaint against defendant, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking a review of a denial of a period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and supplemental security income (“SSI”). The parties have fully briefed the matters in dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. Plaintiff presents one issue for decision, whether the Administrative Law 28 Judge (“ALJ”) erred at step five by failing to resolve an inconsistency between the 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.