Javier Esparza v. John Soto

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20202:14-cv-00577California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 ____________________________________ ) JAVIER ESPARZA, ) No. LA CV 14-00577-VBF-JPR ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ) v. ) Adopting the Report & Recommendation: ) JOHN SOTO (Warden of CSP-LAC), ) Denying the Habeas Corpus Petition; ) ) Directing Entry of Separate Judgment and Respondent. ) Terminating the Case (JS-6) ____________________________________ 17 The Court has reviewed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254; the respondent warden’s answer memorandum and supporting documents (Doc 6); the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”); and the applicable law. Finding no error of law, fact, or logic in the Magistrate Judge’s well- reasoned Report and Recommendation, the Court will accept her factual findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.