Anna Flores v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20205:19-cv-00511California3,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNA F., ) Case No. ED CV 19-511-SP ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17 I. INTRODUCTION On March 21, 2019, plaintiff Anna F. filed a complaint against the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”), seeking a review of a denial of a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). The parties have fully briefed the matter in dispute, and the court deems the matter suitable for adjudication without oral argument. Plaintiff presents one issue for decision, whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred at step five by failing to explain an inconsistency between the vocational expert’s testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (“DOT”). 28 Memorandum in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.