Bernard Burton v. Craig Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20202:20-cv-02277California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 BERNARD BURTON, ) NO. CV 20-2277-JVS (AGR) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE CRAIG KOENIG, Warden, ) ) Respondent. ) ) ) 18 On March 9, 2020, Petitioner, a state prisoner who is proceeding pro se, 19 filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). 20 On April 21, 2020, Respondent filed a motion to vacate the order requiring 21 a response/answer to the Petition on the ground that Petitioner had not sought or 22 obtained authorization from the Ninth Circuit to file a second or successive 23 petition. (Dkt. No. 7.) 24 In response, Petitioner filed a motion to withdraw his Petition so that he 25 could request authorization from the Ninth Circuit to file a second or successive 26 petition. (Dkt. No. 10.) The court construes Petitioner’s motion as a motion to 27 dismiss the Petition without prejudice. 28 In the Ninth Circuit, Petitioner has filed an application for permission to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.