Richard Taylor v. Josie Gastelo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JAMES TAYLOR, Case No. 2:18-cv-01550-FMO (MAA)
12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JOSIE GASTELO, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. For the reasons below, Petitioner’s Objections (ECF No. 30) are overruled. For Ground One, Petitioner objects that he was denied the right to counsel of his choice, Ms. Vargas, and that he was denied the right to be present during the proceeding that was held on the matter. (ECF No. 30 at 7-10.) Petitioner argues that the trial court, outside of his presence, made Ms. Vargas believe that it had rendered a “final determination” denying her continuance motion,…