Edward P. v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20205:19-cv-01794California3,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD P., Case No. 5:19-cv-01794-MAA 12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND

13 v. ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF

THE COMMISSIONER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17 18 On September 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Social Security Commissioner’s partially favorable decision granting in part his application for Supplemental Security Income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This matter is fully briefed and ready for decision. For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff’s name is partially redacted in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 28 PROCEDURAL HISTORY On June 15, 2015, Plaintiff protectively filed an application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.