Frederick Banks v. The CIA

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20202:20-cv-10769California2,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE CIA FIXED THE 2020 U.S. Case No. 2:20-cv-10769-ODW (GJS)

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

FREDERICK BANKS RECEIVED ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

TWO ALLEGHENY COUNTY

(PITTSBURGH) PENNSYLVANIA

BALLOTS OTHER PA VOTERS

WHO RECEIVED MULTIPLE

BALLOTS LIKELY SENT THEM

ALL IN AKA VOTED MULTIPLE

TIMES BY MISTAKE IF NOT

PURPOSELY WHICH IS HOW JOE

BIDEN WAS ABLE TO CLOSE AN

OVER 125,000 VOTE LEAD

TRUMP HAD IN PENNSYLVANIA

FREDERICK BANKS SENT BOTH

BALLOT ENVELOPES TO

IVANKA TRUMP AT THE WHITE

HOUSE,

20 Petitioner 21 v.

THE CIA USED A TECHNOLOGY

CALLED “MICROWAVE

HEARING” OR “MICROWAVE

AUDITORY EFFECT” TO

INFLUENCE ELECTION

OFFICIALS AND VOTERS;

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

AGENCY; FCI Oakdale, LA Warden Maat, 27 Respondents. 28 On November 23, 2020, a putative 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition was filed in this District [Dkt. 1, “Petition”]. The Petition was filed by Frederick Banks, a convicted federal criminal currently incarcerated in the State of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.