William Sardi v. Dorothy Carfrae

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:20-cv-10186California3,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 WILLIAM SARDI, ET AL., Case No. CV 20-10186-MWF (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

DOROTHY CARFRAE, ET AL., LEAVE TO AMEND

Defendant(s).

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff William Sardi (“Sardi”), proceeding pro se, filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 alleging violations of his Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights. ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 10. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC with leave to amend. II. BACKGROUND On November 4, 2020, Sardi filed the Complaint against the court-appointed minor’s counsel Dorothy Carfrae, Family Court Commissioner Doreen Boxer, and On December 2, 2020, Sardi filed the instant FAC against Defendants. Dkt. 10, FAC. Sardi appears to allege that as a result of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.